<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toronto Metblogs &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toronto.metblogs.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='toronto.metblogs.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Toronto To Host The G20?!</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/11/18/toronto-to-host-the-g20/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/11/18/toronto-to-host-the-g20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration and venting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Action Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flip flop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20 Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=2198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have been trying to frantically upgrade Muskoka's infrastructure via a $50 million G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund founded in February, another $5 million in security upgrades for the North Bay airport and other funding initiatives under the Economic Action Plan.  More fuel to critics fire on the current government's priorities favouring Conservative jurisdictions.  Sad that by trying to snub Toronto and move both the G8 and G20 events to cottage country they will have to put at one here anyway.  All lot of added expense for nothing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toronto may be the new venue for the G20<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/harper-government-plans-to-move-g20-summit-to-toronto/article1367540/">.  The Globe and Mail is reporting that the Feds are now realizing that Muskoka may not have the resources to house and secure guests arriving for the G20</a>.  Oops.  It should have been obvious that even a modest make over would fall short of delivering the necessary requirements.</p>
<p>The Conservatives have been trying to frantically upgrade Muskoka&#8217;s infrastructure via a $50 million G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund founded in February, another $5 million in security upgrades for the North Bay airport and other funding initiatives under the Economic Action Plan.  More fuel to critics fire on the current government&#8217;s priorities favouring Conservative jurisdictions.  This of course is <a href="http://www.tonyclement.ca">Tony Clement</a>&#8217;s home riding.</p>
<p>The trough of course looked deep enough for locals, <a href="http://www.huntsvilleforester.com/article/137978">close to $450 million worth of applications</a> were chasing $50 million worth of the gravy.  On the upside some short term construction jobs have been created.  It is hoped that local tourism would get a boost as thousands of officials and media types migrate up to the area.  It&#8217;s more likely that when the summit kicks off next summer that rich government officials will be enjoying cottage land while high paid security police block off potential protesters, terrorists and cottage goers.  At least the local communities will benefit by having new facilities to host future events along with improved infrastructure.</p>
<p>Sad that by trying to snub Toronto and move both the G8 and G20 events to cottage country they will have to put at one here anyway.  All lot of added expense for nothing.  No question there will be immense pain with such a move for Torontonians.  Traffic and security for these events, a nightmare!  Perhaps the Government were trying to minimize the numbers of protesters close to the meetings by moving the summit away from an urban area?  Well a private web-chat or conference call would have been preferred to the mountain of wasteful deficit spending for this circus ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/11/18/toronto-to-host-the-g20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nortel Assets Find New Home</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/28/nortel-assets-find-new-home/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/28/nortel-assets-find-new-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration and venting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sellout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Pride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=2077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much to the annoyance of RIM, Sweden&#8217;s Ericsson has emerged the winner in the bid for Nortel Networks Corp.&#8217;s wireless division.  Research in Motion claimed that they had been blocked from the bidding process.  Not surprising.
The quest of the current government to divest or sell off Canadian assets stretches further than nuclear isotopes. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much to the annoyance of <a href="http://www.rim.net/">RIM</a>, Sweden&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ericsson.com/">Ericsson</a> has emerged the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/07/24/nortel-rim-auction.html">winner in the bid for Nortel Networks Corp.&#8217;s wireless division</a>.  Research in Motion <a href="http://press.rim.com/release.jsp?id=2435">claimed that they had been blocked from the bidding process</a>.  Not surprising.</p>
<p>The quest of the current government to divest or sell off Canadian assets stretches further than nuclear isotopes.  Jim Balsillie, RIM&#8217;s co-chief executive officer stated, </p>
<p><em>&#8220;RIM is extremely disappointed that Nortel&#8217;s world leading technology, the development of which has been funded in part by Canadian taxpayers, seems destined to leave Canada and that Canada’s own Export  Development Corporation is preparing to help by lending $300 million to another bidder.  RIM remains extremely interested in acquiring Nortel assets through a Canadian ownership solution that would serve the dual purpose of keeping key wireless technologies in Canada and extending RIM’s leadership in the research, development and distribution of leading edge wireless solutions, but RIM has found itself blocked at every turn.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Selling off Canadian innovation in our national interests to keep seems counter-intuitive, but not to the current helm at Industry Canada.  Hate to think how they will handle a tourism portfolio when Jim Flaherty has mentioned he may sell off Via Rail.</p>
<p>Yes, the addition of The Marquee Tourism Events Program (MTEP) to Indusrty Minister&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tonyclement.ca/">(Tony Clement)</a> plate comes after sexy isotopes and hopes to privatize nuclear medicine in Canada.  The tourism portfolio inheritance comes with the turfing of junior cabinet minister Diane Ablonczy (likely over $400,000 of funding to the Toronto Pride Parade).  Marry this off with further sell offs of Canadian patents and technology and the new &#8220;Conservatives&#8221; are taunting the opposition and adding fuel to the election fire.</p>
<p>Well a fight seems to be brewing at least here at Queen&#8217;s Park.  <a href="http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/english/about/min.html">Dwight Duncan</a>, Ontario&#8217;s finance minister, feels that technology funded with Canadian taxpayer money shouldn&#8217;t easily be sold off to a foreign company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/28/nortel-assets-find-new-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIA Back On Track!</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/26/via-back-on-track/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/26/via-back-on-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIA Rail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=2093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Teamsters and Via Rail came to an agreement early this morning after meeting with a federally appointed mediator.  Locomotive engineers agreed to settle their differences through binding arbitration, ending a two-day walkout.  The engineers have been without a contract for 2½ years and have been pressing for improved training, work schedules and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Teamsters and Via Rail came to an agreement early this morning after meeting with a federally appointed mediator.  Locomotive engineers agreed to settle their differences through binding arbitration, ending a two-day walkout.  The engineers have been without a contract for 2½ years and have been pressing for improved training, work schedules and benefits.  </p>
<p>Trains will roll out of Union Station later this afternoon! (around 6pm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/07/26/via-back-on-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We There Yet?</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/05/07/are-we-there-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/05/07/are-we-there-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration and venting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TSX is looking a little better these days.  Is the optimism too much too soon?  I mean we have made quite an improvement here.
I for one wont fret for a marked increase in my financial health but calls for the end of THE END OF THE RECESSION are a bit premature.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TSX is looking a little better these days.  Is the optimism too much too soon?  I mean we have made <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/05/06/tsx-breaks.html">quite an improvement</a> here.</p>
<p>I for one wont fret for a marked increase in my financial health but calls for the end of THE END OF THE RECESSION are a bit premature.  Hang on to your hats folks, the market is a wild ride. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/05/07/are-we-there-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombardier vs. Siemens Canada &#8211; Who Won?</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/24/bombardier-vs-siemens-canada-who-won/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/24/bombardier-vs-siemens-canada-who-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombardier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streetcars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TTC announced today that Bombardier beat out Siemens Canada for a bid to replace Toronto&#8217;s aging streetcar fleet.  The estimated billion-plus-dollar contract will provide the TTC with new streetcars and replace nearly all of the 30 year old streetcar fleet.  There will also be an option to build another 364 cars as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TTC announced today that <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/623916">Bombardier beat out Siemens Canada</a> for a bid to replace Toronto&#8217;s aging streetcar fleet.  The estimated billion-plus-dollar contract will provide the TTC with new streetcars and replace nearly all of the 30 year old streetcar fleet.  There will also be an option to build another 364 cars as light rail service expands.</p>
<p>Siemens Canada had tried to sweeten their deal by pledging to build their streetcars at a local plant.  Bombardier, though based in Montreal, already have a factory Thunder Bay (though most if not all of their light rail manufacturing is in Europe).</p>
<p>In the end Toronto really won.  By focusing on best practices and the needs of its Toronto riders, the TTC has done the right thing.  We may soon have greener, cleaner and more accessible streetcars.  A move in the right direction and at a fraction of the cost of a subway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/24/bombardier-vs-siemens-canada-who-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto Man Arrested Trying To Export Transducers</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/17/toronto-man-arrested-trying-to-export-transducers/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/17/toronto-man-arrested-trying-to-export-transducers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear mongering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man is being held under the on charges under the Customs Act and Export Import Permits Act .  The Toronto Star has reported that a Toronto man is being held for trying to export nuclear technology.    Transducers, while not always innocuous as a lab beaker, can be used for legitimate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man is being held under the on charges under the <a href="http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/imp/guide2e.shtml">Customs Act and Export Import Permits Act </a>.  The Toronto Star has reported that <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/620123">a Toronto man is being held for trying to export nuclear technology</a>.    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transducer">Transducers</a>, while not always innocuous as a lab beaker, can be used for legitimate as well as mad scientist purposes.  Caution is not a bad thing but it will be interesting to see whether these charges stick and the intent of this man was to export weapons or restricted goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/04/17/toronto-man-arrested-trying-to-export-transducers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds And Ontario Give GO A Boost</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/02/17/feds-and-ontario-give-go-a-boost/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/02/17/feds-and-ontario-give-go-a-boost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration and venting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public expenditures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today Premier McGuinty and PM Stephen Harper announced that GO Transit will receive an additional $500 million in funding.  This funding is to be split between the province and the federal government and targeted on station parking lots and upgrading rail lines to increase service reliabiliity.
It would be nice if local municipal transit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today Premier McGuinty and PM Stephen Harper announced that <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/588668">GO Transit will receive an additional $500 million in funding</a>.  This funding is to be split between the province and the federal government and targeted on station parking lots and upgrading rail lines to increase service reliabiliity.</p>
<p>It would be nice if local municipal transit could be better integrated into GO Transit (so many of these city systems work outside the realm of the big transit picture).  Sadly few offer service that can meet up with evening trains let alone most rush hour trips.  For now more spacious parking lots will have to be the incentive for car happy commuters connecting to Toronto via transit (rather than local buses).  I&#8217;ve seen the huge surge in GO ridership over the last year first hand due to high gas prices.  These are baby steps sure, but steps in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2009/02/17/feds-and-ontario-give-go-a-boost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United In The Fight</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/12/01/united-in-the-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/12/01/united-in-the-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accept the verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprimise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence of the House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace under pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse gas targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisan politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repair trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official.  The opposition has united to defeat the government and the policies presented by the Minister of Finance.  Uncharted territory here.  Amazing to see how fast differing viewpoints could draft an agreement and proposal to stimulate the economy over the weekend.  Mr. Flaherty has called it &#8220;a deal with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official.  <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081130/conservative_budget_081201/20081201?hub=TopStories">The opposition has united to defeat the government</a> and the policies presented by the Minister of Finance.  Uncharted territory here.  Amazing to see how fast differing viewpoints could draft an agreement and proposal to stimulate the economy over the weekend.  Mr. Flaherty has called it &#8220;a deal with the devil&#8221;?</p>
<p>Canada is stronger together, perhaps a coalition government might actually work together toward rebuilding Canada during these trying times.  I think that we are in for more concrete action than the Conservatives are willing to admit since ALL opposition parties have committed to unite until June 30, 2011!  (The Bloc are supportive of this coalition for 18 months and can extend support after that time since they are not formally part of the coalition).  The economy and the environment are front and centre.  The coalition will pursue prudent policies to stimulate the economy through investments in infrastructure, boosts to struggling economic sectors as well as home construction and retrofit (low income housing? green tax breaks?).  Most important, long term deficits are not in the interest of the coalition.  </p>
<p><em>&#8220;Today we respectfully inform the Governor General that, as soon as the appropriate opportunity arises, she should call on the Leader of the Official Opposition to form a new government, supported as set out in the accompanying accords by all three of our parties.</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>Hon. Stéphane Dion<br />
Leader, the Liberal Party of Canada</p>
<p>Hon. Jack Layton<br />
Leader, the New Democratic Party of Canada</p>
<p>Gilles Duceppe<br />
Leader, the Bloc Québécois&#8221;</p>
<p>- from the agreement signed by Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe, NDP Leader Jack Layton and Liberal Leader Stephane Dion on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa, on Monday Dec. 1, 2008</em></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, Governor General of Canada reacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/12/01/united-in-the-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSX &#8211; WTF</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/09/29/tsx-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/09/29/tsx-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustration and venting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wait it out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The largest point drop ever!  The TSX is hurting after news in America spooked the market.  Is the sky falling?  Not sure just yet but it I&#8217;m sure it will be a bumpy ride.  Some economists saying we have 3 quarters worth of slow to negative growth ahead in Canada.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/09/29/stocks-dive.html?ref=rss">largest point drop</a> ever!  The <a href="http://www.tsx.com/">TSX </a>is hurting after <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/09/29/us-bailout.html">news in America spooked the market</a>.  Is the sky falling?  Not sure just yet but it I&#8217;m sure it will be a bumpy ride.  Some economists saying we have 3 quarters worth of slow to negative growth ahead in Canada.  OUCH!  </p>
<p>Praying for the best.  It will be interesting to see how things play out in the debates.  Jack Layton, in Toronto campaigning, called for <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/story/2008/09/29/layton-mtg.html">a meeting of all parties on the potential Canadian crisis but this was rejected</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/09/29/tsx-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U of T + IBM = Supercomputer</title>
		<link>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/08/14/u-of-t-ibm-supercomputer/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/08/14/u-of-t-ibm-supercomputer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swoononeone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U of T]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto.metblogs.com/?p=1529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The University of Toronto is joining forces with IBM.  They hope to build a supercomputer among the top 20 in the world and the fastest in Canada.  The computer has been optimized with respect to energy use and will have a dedicated building to house it at a projected cost of C$50 million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/08/14/2008-08-14T040103Z_01_N13356797_RTRIDST_0_CANADA-SUPERCOMPUTER.html">University of Toronto is joining forces with IBM</a>.  They hope to build a supercomputer among the top 20 in the world and the fastest in Canada.  The computer has been optimized with respect to energy use and will have a dedicated building to house it at a projected cost of C$50 million over 5 years.</p>
<p>Not the first time that a major university has set their sights on a supercomputer.  Good to see U of T stepping up to the likes of <a href="http://www.apple.com/science/profiles/vatech2/">Virginia Tech</a> and <a href="http://rc.uits.iu.edu/kb/index.php?kbID=aueo">Indiana University</a> who have long enjoyed the use of and prestige of managing such a system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto.metblogs.com/2008/08/14/u-of-t-ibm-supercomputer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
